Quoting: AsciiWolfIt's a pity that Albion Online is not on Steam and probably won't be in the near future. :-/

We're Greenlit since a long time and at least the plan is that we eventually will!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I played it like at least 2 years ago and really enjoyed it. Might even more now with a Steam Controller so looking forward to that. =)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Couldn't agree more.

Personally, I additionally set games option to get rid of the DLC spam:

http://store.steampowered.com/search/?sort_by=Released_DESC&tags=-1&category1=998&os=linux

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Unfortunately, incremental conversion are not always possible and even if it still has changes are not to be underestimated since assets often depend in others. E.g. having any asset change in a level it might be important to completely re-process the exported level. At the very least incremental conversion are much more error prone which is why not a single studio I worked for does it, at least not fully. And a lot of time consuming processes are actually platform specific like converting textures into GPU supported compressed formats. E.g. when using Unity3D a platform switch (or clean import which is necessary since without we had random wrong assets in game otherwise every now and then) can take 1h for project which has Gigabytes of assets. A platform build for such a sized projected around ~30min (for Android it can be 5x as long).

Of course builds are typically nightly jobs. But again let's say one platform fails. That means one day of update delay, or one day with a broken live version (games without an online mode might get away with keeping the old version ofc). So lets say one of the game designers has scheduled a dedicated play session for the changes in that build, which means all his work & planning gets out of sync because one platform failed. This is just one example of many.

Also a dedicated full month of "porting" towards the release can be more efficient / cheaper. Let's say I'm in the middle of coding feature X but then one platform build breaks. That means I have switch context, find the issue and fix it and get my head back into the others problems to solve. It's another extra cost.

I agree with most of the bullet points though but still I think you underestimate the cost by assuming 'ideal' conditions which never are the case in my experience.

That said with our current project 'Albion Online' we have a Linux version continually since the first public release and I'm very proud of that. So it definitely is possible but I also understand if studios have different priorities.

I actually backed The Wild 8 myself and got excited when I received the Steam key recently only to find out I had to wait a little while longer. ;-)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: GuestI find this kind of excuse highly suspicious personally. It's really not difficult to have a build server these days, triggered by any code commit, and that can target build for multiple platforms. Or just do it manually, depending on the code size, team size, etc. Either way, they should have a build setup in place - literally press a button / run a command to say "build".

So, pushing out a fix shouldn't be difficult to do across all platforms simultaneously.

Of course, I've left out other things - maybe there's truly some platform specific code and some level of QA they want to do that means the game needs to be played to some extent. Even that should be able to be automated to a degree (it's called a benchmark). So a basic level of sanity is still available with that.

Of course, I would assume that platform-specific code is minimal as well. They should have had file naming, screen handling, input handling, etc, all sorted. If they actually want to do cross-platform at all, that should have been sorted by now - otherwise, they'd have to redo a lot of things later, waste a lot of time later, and then probably end up blaming everyone else but themselves.

tldr; the "excuse" doesn't pass the smell test. If that was truly blocking them, it's not a good impression of their capabilities on _any_ platform, let alone anything cross-platform.

Believe me it's not nearly as simple as that.

* Build times can be something like 8h after you press that button even if you have parallel build nodes for each target platform (that's not compiling code, that's fast. I mean converting models and other data, automated tests, ..). so to be clear, detecting a bug on a single platform during QA can worst case result in an delay of 8h which is at the very least a single work day.

* Even if QA runs only smoke test it's at least 2h if QA per platform before a small update. And you definitely don't want to only do that for most. Since going through user bug reports, reproducing them and formatting them so programmers can fix them quickly is even less efficient then a little longer in house testing.

* Usually DEVs try to ensure file naming, screen/input handling and other things (e.g. different render APIs) to work independently across the platforms. In reality however there's always something you miss initially if not tested for it. Even if engines like Unity3D deal with most of it.

Running EA or any alpha/beta each non primary platform costs actually a lot. It can be worth it but let's be honest. In most cases it's not.

Again promising something and not delivering always sucks. But having a Linux version during EA wich is either broken half of the time, or has other bugs won't give the game a good reputation either. Actually it might even hurt sales on the primary platform if word of mouth is really bad. And again making sure that it is not the case comes a price which shouldn't be underestimated. You know a game doesn't only costs 100-200k just because that's what the kickstarter raised. It's more likely 10x as much as people think. So is another platform during EA.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: SirBubblesI'd like to chime in. After being burned by Kingdom Come: Deliverance and The Mandate, I'd be really hesitant about touching anything from Kickstarter. Getting a cheaper price isn't quite the same as buying a product you can have some certainty about. Delayed for years and not supporting the platform you use is not good enough. And here is another dev saying "can't be arsed supporting linux. Too hard".

Did you read the steam discussion? Their first post was:

QuoteThank you!
Yes, Linux version will be available!

And yes I can absolutely understand that you focus on one platform if you want to push out updates on a daily frequency or similar during EA. Actually, I'd recommend not being bitchy to dev for that since the result will be less games on Linux.

Of if anyone promises and Linux release and but there won't be any at all it's a completely different story.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Did they really promise Linux/SteamOS during the EA period?

Ofc not having the SteamOS icon for the real release would be disappointing but if it's only EA I don't really care unless they drag it out for more than half a year or so.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I really hope for Hitman! However intriguingly there's no mac symbol up but Hitman also has a depo for mac on SteamDB.

My bet is on: Deus_Ex: Human_Revolution
It's already on Mac and has a Rifleman Bank Station location.
(Taking the hint from Mblackwell)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I got hooked during x-mas, played it for 1 weekend almost straight.. :-)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

loved that game as a child! <3

View this comment - View article - View full comments