QuoteI’d love to see a more robust IDE matching the power of Visual Studio hit Linux.

I've recently got into the game industry and forced to use Visual Studio. In just a few months, I have seen it crash and burn, get in infinite loops, lose my settings, etc. Also, Intellisense is slow, so they recommend some add-on. Searching is slow, so another add-on. I also use the vim add-on. Essentially, the whole thing is useless and needs to be replaced with add-ons.

On Linux, I personally treat the whole system like an IDE. Desktop workspaces can be used to reduce the clutter of opened files. Ctrl+` greatly simplifies navigation between windows. The extremely fast terminal is great to quickly search for something/open a file. Not to mention that bash will let you do things you can never imagine with an IDE, like transform a set of variables in all your files based on some regex, or search for patterns again with regexes. On top of that, working with git (or most other version control systems) is easiest in the terminal (really, type what you want instead of looking at 100 options in some GUI list).

I know that for someone who's used to IDEs switching to separate editor and build could be odd at first, but if you do learn it, I guarantee you'd cringe at how limited your life is with IDEs.

---

Nevertheless, if all fails, try Qt Creator (and use it to create non-Qt applications). Between IDEs, that's the sanest I have seen around.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Have you noticed the "GPU Driver (AMD)" trend graph has over 105% as the sum of free and proprietary drivers for Jan 2017? That graph generally looks weird: the free driver is on a smooth rise, but the proprietary goes up and down... shouldn't they be complementary?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Tomb Raider: even though I played it only once, it was what attracted me to join Eidos Montreal!
Borderlands 2, Payday 2 and Rocket League: the games I play with my brother (who's on windows)
Countless indie games: these are the games I actually spend most of my time on!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

The worst part about "one-click confirm" is that you need a multi-click step to log in first. Many times I am discouraged from doing anything on this website (including writing a comment), because I have to click login, be taken to Steam's login page, put my credentials, get the authenticator code, put it in, wait for the page to be loaded back.

I'm permanently logged in to my Google account on my phone, which is a far riskier thing to do that to be permanently logged in to GOL on my PC. If you allow one to stay logged in for a long time, with the usual "Remember Me" checkbox or something (checkbox disable by default), that would definitely increase my activity here.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Starcraft 2. I stopped using windows before Legacy of the Void, and I really want to buy/play that campaign, but of course not until it's on Linux.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

If anyone is still following, I've added a couple more tutorials since I posted this.

Most recently, I added one where I fake a presentation engine (as if done in the driver) that renders to terminal with ncurses. With very minimal changes to the application, I get a Vulkan-rendered triangle on the terminal!

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Shameless self-advertisement: I also have a couple Linux-oriented tutorials: https://www.gamingonlinux.com/articles/user-submission-vulkan-tutorials-now-up-on-github.7621

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: SmalokiImpressive! I actually held off on learning Vulkan because I was told that you'd need a certain amount of experience with graphics programming to comprehend it. And since I just started playing around with OpenGL three months ago, I figured I'd never be able to get into Vulkan.

I'd say you need to know a bit of math, matrix transformations in particular, but then again you would need to know that for any graphics API anyway! To be honest, when I didn't know about something in Vulkan, I would look it up in the context of OpenGL (where there are a lot of info online), and almost everything, conceptually, is the same. I don't see why you wouldn't learn Vulkan directly.

Only thing I can say about that, and I'm sure you know already, is that it's much easier in OpenGL to get something drawn on the screen. But once you can do that in Vulkan, everything else is actually much easier; the API is very clean, there is zero cruft, and no strange behavior because of legacy.

Quoting: Smaloki... no Vulkan binding for Vala atm. Maybe I'll implement one myself someday...

How awesome would that be? :)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Thanks for all the positive responses, guys! I'm happy I managed to inspire a few. :)

Like all free software, do feel free to point out errors, imprecisions, or send pull requests.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: NyamiouAs for OpenGL it can actually be more powerful than Direct3D, why do you thing DOOM is done with OpenGL?

Completely true. A few months ago some apparently famous guy was showing equal performance between vulkan opengl 4.5. Opengl is very powerful, it's just terribly used. Vulkan is just a more modern reimplemention of the same stuff as opengl.

Quoting: NyamiouAnd Vulkan was created to beat and destroy DirectX 12.

Completely false. DX12 was microsoft's feable attempt to get their own "vulkan" out before the real vulkan. DX12 development started after Vulkan was announced. In fact, if I recall correctly, microsoft was part of the vulkan group just until before releasing DX12, and the fact that they are so similar makes one wonder how to call it anything but stealing.

View this comment - View article - View full comments