Sooo...what keeps them from merging the Staging patches into the main branch anyway? If they have been used for that long, should think they are proven to work, no?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Which gaming relevant patches are in Staging that didn't yet make it to the main branch?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Purple Library GuyIt is looking like the market share of Linux for gaming in specific may be less than 1%. I've been wondering about the difference; are Linux users mostly not gamers?

Given that for the longest time of Linux' existence you had to accept having no games whatsoever available for it, I guess that's a safe assumption to make. For all but the last 3-4 years (plus the short time when Loki ported some games), Linux was one of the few operating systems on Earth you absolutely couldn't game with. I guess it's safe to say that -nobody- here starting using it for gaming, and I suppose a OS you can't game with is particularly attractive to people who don't game in the first place.
In my (totally not representative) group of Linux users I know in real life, I am the only gamer...

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Mountain Man"SteamOS didn't turn out to be what we all hoped."

He speaks for all of us.

Seriously. Can somebody message that Paradox quote to Gabe?

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: liamdaweThey have seriously long-term support for their games, more so than the vast majority of developers. Pushing out DLC (that is not required) enables them to continue getting funds for each team working on each game, plus they always do a free content patch with each DLC.

I agree! I mean...look at how old CK2 is, and they are STILL making content for it. I love this game, and they keep making it better and better. Which is waaaay better than the usual "fire and forget" approach other publishers take. If you compare that to the Civilization franchise, they keep (re-)making the same game over and over, releasing it with graphics updates (and sometimes downgrades, like the horrible art style they picked for Civ VI), and one or two minor new features, I keep buying CK2 DLC for a few years longer, thank you!

As for their continued Linux support - I guess we're safe as far as their Clausewitz II games go, as they already ported that engine to Linux and can probably port games using it to Linux with minimal effort, as long as they keep using/updating that engine.
The problem might be their -other- games. Like Cities Skylines, which probably had to be built from the ground up to support Linux, costing them additional resources. They might be tempted to say "nah, let's not bother" next time. Which would suck, thinking that Cities Skylines is one of the best games we have on Linux.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: buenaventuraI just bought Europa Universalis IV for 10 euros at their awesome Valentine's Sale (which wasn't even advertised here as far as I've seen?) and I am just getting into it. Feels like a typical "mega nerd dad game" that will just devour my nocturnal life, so Paradox, expect me to buy some DLC real soon!

The odd thing really is that I was flabbergasted when I read that Paradox isn't doing well on Linux. They make the exact type of games I would have assumed to be really appealing to Linux users. I would have expected their Linux market share to be way above industry average.

Turns out, not. Meh :(

Just bought three DLC packs I didn't yet have, too. Just because.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Alm888snip

I can totally accept not being able to play PUBG, or EA/Ubi games. I consider them "platform exclusive" games that just aren't available for my platform. That's fine. What I don't (want to) accept is having no AAA games at all. As in zero, nada, nothing.

We -have- AAA games. The selection could be greater, sure, but we get enough AAA games that we don't -need- to boot Windows 100% of the time when we're in the mood for playing a game.

Yet.

But with your attitude, this picture might change soon enough, and it won't be only PUBG that makes you boot Windows (I hope you -never- use that either btw. - it's got built in DRM!). Paradox is currently supplying a very healthy portion of all AAA games released to Linux. And if they go, others might follow quickly.

Then it will be back to Tux Racer and cheap Indie games.

Well, for you that is.

Since I am not a knuckleheaded ideologist, I still have other options. WINE being one of them. Dual-booting the other. I'd -very- much prefer to see AAA games continue to being released natively on Linux, but apparently people like you are working really hard on putting an end to what might be remembered as the time when Linux got good games for a brief period in history.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Purple Library GuyI've never quite understood the big problem with Steam "DRM". As far as I can tell, I can play my games in offline mode without an internet connection. So, like, the games will play without phoning home. So what's the problem?

As I said above, it's an ideology for them. The ONLY time when Steam's DRM is actually getting in people's way is when they want to sell their games to another person, which would normally be legit, but is made impossible by Steam's DRM. The fun thing is that close to 100% of the time there is no solid desire to sell off used (=older) games, because old games tend to be dirt cheap on Steam anyway (sales...), so there is no real market for second-hand games.

I -swear- that a good approximation to 100% of the "Steam is so evil because DRM" crowd are in fact utter hypocrites that tolerate DRM anywhere but on Linux - but otherwise happily buy smartphones, gaming consoles, streaming or cable TV subscriptions, movies and E-Books. None of which come DRM free.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Alm888Sorry, Paradox, but DRM-free or it didn't happen. I won't give Valve a cent.

<rant>

You do realize that this attitude is part of what might make bigger publishers reconsider supporting Linux, yes? If you're not buying their games for purely ideological reasons (and that's what it is), they might oblige and stop offering them.

Am I a fan of DRM? Certainly not. But mildly intrusive systems like Steam's are still better than having no games at all. And as others have pointed out, Paradox doesn't even -use- Steam's DRM features, so this makes boycotting them extra-dumb in my book.

This Steam bashing coming from some zealots here makes me angry, in all honesty. Without Valve pushing us, we would have a handful of low-budget, garage-made Indie games and Tux Racer to play. In other words, nothing worth mentioning. I guess I wouldn't even BE here, because I'd still use Windows 99% of the time when playing games, instead of the other way around, which Valve had no small part in making possible.

If people like you would finally put their knuckleheaded ideology away and start buying games from Steam they would have bought from GOG without even thinking twice, publishers like Paradox wouldn't think about dropping support for us. In other words, yes, I think you're a part of the problem here.

PS: I hope you don't have any Android/iOS smartphone, any streaming subscription or cable TV either. All of these have built-in DRM, so you folks have to boycott them, too!

</rant>

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I bought every single one of their games, and will keep doing so.

But we need a bigger push from Valve's end, if we ever want to break through the 1%-2% ceiling. I am also afraid that publishers might get tempted to jump ship if they don't see actual progress with SteamOS anytime soon. Right now it's going waaaaaaay too slow.

View this comment - View article - View full comments