Quoting: GuestThe chosen terms are not very clear to me.
"Verified, Playable, Unsupported and Unknown"
Is "Playable" better or worse than "Verified"? What does "verified" even mean? It could mean it has been verified as not working.
"Unsupported", ok, but it doesn’t tell if it’s working or not.
"Unknown" is of course not helping much either.

I’m not asking for the answers, just saying they should choose terms that immediately make sense.

From the video, the symbols are clearer (checkmark, letter i and crossed circle) and apparently there is a tooltip listing the details for each game - whether it is listed as "playable" due to not working with a controller or text being small or requiring extra steps, for example.

Once we have the symbols, I think the names actually clarify things - it further explains that the green checkmark means the game was verified to work and that the i in a circle means the game is playable but requires more information (as opposed to checkmark meaning, say, "no issues reported" and the i meaning "unplayable and here are the details"). Still, there probably could be a better design.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: TheRiddick

Quoting: GustyGhostsalty about cryptocurrency because of their experiences with inflated GPU prices.

I'm mostly salty over it because it drives up energy costs dramatically (I've seen %40 rise here since Crypto took off a few years ago), and also the cost on the environment is HUGE.

Just do the math on how much coal needs to be burnt in order to perform a full bitcoin transaction, scary.. not sustainable at all and will likely kill us off as a species if we continue in this way.

The best quote I ever saw about cryptocurrencies is that they are "the most direct way capitalists have found of turning global warming into money".

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Purple Library GuyI must be out of the loop. What's an NFT? I'd look it up, but acronyms are notoriously bad for searching.

It stands for "Non-Fungible Token". It's like a bitcoin, except it is unique, and it is a certificate of ownership for something (usually some art). Just a "certificate" with a hyperlink, not even a real file, and even that is already so large it costs a ton of electricity and computing power to "mint" it. Since it is in the blockchain you can't just create a copy but you can transfer it to someone else - so it is actually like a decentralized notebook where you write down who owns the moon and the purchase history for it.

Imagine the bullshit of rich art collectors and the bullshit of cryptocurrencies. People are spending a ton of money in NFTs because of the promise of selling their "unique pieces of art".

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: katp32

Quote...they don't allow items that can have real-world value on their platform...

Are we talking about the same Valve here? Team Fortress 2 and CS:GO would beg to differ!

The issue is with how you could "redeem" the items outside the game for real money, and a bunch of problems it could cause. Valve has cracked down on CS skin gambling sites, for example. The terms of service probably also set some limits to what you can and can't do, though they might not be respected (like not selling accounts).

Most games with in-game currency state that you can't "cash in" that currency for real-world money. Even if you sell items in the steam marketplace, it shouldn't be possible to take the money out of your steam wallet, it is only store credit. (If you buy credit, you might be able to get a refund, but for things like gift cards or selling items nope)

The reasons are quite obvious: money laundering, gambling, scams. Probably illegal, but even if not I don't think Steam would like to kick this wasp nest.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

QuotePlenty more is argued as well of course. In the notice it complains how the code now runs on platforms it was never released for where the "Defendants have sought to exploit a potential market that belongs exclusively to Take-Two", it argues against new cheats enabled in the source code which "are strictly prohibited under Take-Two’s terms of service". It goes further, complaining about modding which Take-Two say "encouraging users to further infringe the original Games and to violate their agreements with Take-Two that prohibit such activities".

Runs on platforms it was never released for: that's great, someone improved the original. You didn't release and you think you can complain, because of the potential market that you want to reserve. Because people that already bought (you need original assets) need to buy again for a different platform, which is already bad.

Making mods illegal? That's both stupid and evil. Cheats on single-player also are none of your business, suing people for that is utterly stupid.

They probably are legally correct... because those laws are utter bullshit.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Nice! This game has a very solid core gameplay compared to most RTS that comes out these days, but I miss some more complexity. This probably goes a long way.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

I like itch a lot and would really like to buy stuff there once in a while, but with exchange rates as they are buying anything in dollar is just "nope" (in addition to usual fees and costs that always make it a pain). Even the super-bargains in Humble are of questionable value those days.

(I'm in Brazil, but I believe this is true for most places outside developed countries)

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Oooh, pretty. I really love low-poly graphics, and this looks if not amazing at least good.

As for gameplay, I don't know, it doesn't look like my cup of tea. Clearly multiplayer focused, seems like relatively small scope (not huge sprawling games), design based on well-defined stages (economy up then attack, with harassing early on) and not a lot of variation in scenarios and stuff. Not my style of RTS - I prefer something like, say, Northgard.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: toivopI've bought them, but I'm wondering if the DLC sale means they are about to release Solaris 2, they did the same sort of thing with Crusader Kings

Nope. They are releasing a new expansion soon, there is a Stellaris boardgame that entered kickstarter just today, and the game is generally strong. CK3 was released after CK2 was 8 years old - Stellaris is only half that age and doesn't seem to be slowing down.

CK2 had at least two bundles for itself, besides Paradox bundles with many games (I first got the game in a bundle and then got more DLC in another bundle), then it was free (to keep) for a few days, had a last big expansion than changed to free updates only, before eventually going free to play as the new game released. I don't think just being in a bundle is a sign of the end.

View this comment - View article - View full comments

Quoting: Guest

Quoting: eldakingDamn, our currency has tanked so much that the highest level is just above the normal price of the stuff when on sale and the average level is way pricier than buying on sale.

Oh ! Where do you live ?

Brazil - even with "normal" exchange rates Humble Bundle always needed some math if you didn't want every single game. But now it's just "don't ever buy anything that is imported or paid for in dollars".

View this comment - View article - View full comments